Evolutionary Fossil Frauds

>> Sunday, October 11, 2009

I have been challenged to show sources why so many of these missing-links that evolutionist find are frauds. I have posted some of this information before, but I am going to post some more here.

The thing is that there have been so many frauds, why should we believe Ardi or Ida is any different. And by the way, only a couple of months after Ida was big news did scientists stop talking about it. (I wonder why...)

Fraud #1:

Java man: Initially discovered by Dutchman Eugene Dubois in 1891, all that was found of this claimed originator of humans was a skullcap, three teeth and a femur. The femur was found 50 feet away from the original skullcap a full year later. For almost 30 years Dubois downplayed the Wadjak skulls (two undoubtedly human skulls found very close to his "missing link").

Fraud #2:

Orce man: Found in the southern Spanish town of Orce in 1982, and hailed as the oldest fossilized human remains ever found in Europe. One year later officials admitted the skull fragment was not human but probably came from a 4 month old donkey.

Fraud #3:

Piltdown man: Found to be a forgery 41 years later.
Not a Creationist Source

Fraud #4:

Nebraska man: A single tooth, discovered in Nebraska in 1922 grew an entire evolutionary link between man and monkey, until another identical tooth was found which was protruding from the jawbone of a wild pig.
Not a Christian Source

Fraud #5:


Lucy's actual remains did not included hands or feet and reconstructions are commonly presented with human or near-human hands and feet despite the fact that other skeletons of the same creature have hands and feet which are clearly those of an ape, with curved fingers for moving about in trees. Mary Leakey in fact had found clear tracks of human footprints in the same strata and location as Lucy's remains and the assumption is that at least one australopithicus MUST have had human feet.

Asked whether a better explanation would be that the tracks were simply produced by humans, Leakey and others replied that was impossible since the tracks were millions of years old.

The obvious explanation of course is that a human made the footprints and "Lucy" was simply that human's pet monkey.

The story actually gets better (much better) from there if you can believe that, with evolutionists claiming that a deer or other animal trampled "Lucy"'s hips and pelvis, breaking them into pieces, and that the pieces congealed by chances into the conformation of those of an ape, and deriving the true picture of Lucy's hips and pelvis by making a plaster cast, breaking it up with a saw, and then rearranging the pieces into a more human conformation.

For anybody willing to part with the twelve dollars, this little documentary offers an astonishing glimpse into the mindset of the evolution true believer.

David Menton earned a Ph.D. in cell biology from Brown University (wow, I biologist that doesn't believe in evolution). He served as a biomedical research technician at Mayo Clinic and then as an associate professor of anatomy at Washington University School of Medicine (St Louis). For almost two decades he has been profiled in American Men and Women of Science—A Biographical Directory of Today’s Leaders in Physical, Biological and Related Sciences. Dr. Menton has lectured throughout the United States and Canada on the creation-evolution controversy.

Has good material with videos
Christian Article
(You aren't going to find any non-creationist articles because the evolutionist are still holding this discovery is valid. However, the other frauds listed above aren't even supported by evolutionist.)

With just this short list of well known frauds, I am puzzled why anybody trusts what evolutionist say about human evolution especially when it comes to these so called missing links. There is a reason why the majority of people, at least in America, do not support evolution.

"In an attempt to further their careers and justify the claims that evolution is a legitimate theory, many scientists have fraudulently deceived the world by planting or reconstructing fossils which they would claim to be authentic finds."


Anonymous October 11, 2009 at 11:30 PM  

YOU USED INTERNET SITES AND CALL IT PROOF!? :p I am sorry but a chimpanzee could do a better job researching. Try a book by a reputable scientist. Any yahoo can put crap on the internet. I teach my students to watch out for pseudo scientists like those idiots. If you won't go to a scientist for information on the stupernatural then why would you go to an idiot for science?

Greg October 12, 2009 at 10:58 AM  

Well Anonymous,

That is true. But, I don't have time to spend hours trying to convince unconvincable people about the truth. I already believe in the true. You are the one that should be doing research so you can find the truth. I pointed a few sites out to you to give you another point of view. If you don't agree with the facts they present, then you should do the research to prove that their facts are wrong. What proof would you need? Do you want to see counter scientific papers to dismiss these false fossils? (Visit ICR) If I gave you a scientific paper about these fossils, are you going to go to the library and read it? Why would I spend hours giving you the information that you would want when you won't read it anyway. This is only a blog. All I am doing is giving you enough material so you might have doubts in your scientific God and do some research yourself.

There are many legitimate books written by scientist with PHDs to give you the counter arguments to Evolution.

The Institute for Creation Research is filled with scientists in all fields of science that do not believe in Evolution. Are you going to visit their website to read their counter arguments? I am sure you have never visited their website, or even attempted to read their point of view because you have already been brainwashed.

Why don't you try to read them and manybe you will see the truth.

Nice try though...a blog is only one person's point of view.

Bob November 26, 2009 at 3:22 AM  

Please tell me this is a joke. Greg, your ignorance really is monumental. I would recommend you go out and read some impartial credible information before embarrassing yourself in this way. Then you may realise that fossils are only the "icing on the cake" of evolutionary theory, it is the molecular evidence that really provides the main bulk of the evidence for evolution. Even if we had never found any fossils, the weight of evidence for evolution would still be overwhelming.

For every one fraudulent fossil you mention there are hundreds of genuine ones. Why are you not providing both sides of the argument?

Please never again mention The Institute for Creation Research (and yes, I have read many of their pseudo scientific articles), going to these people on the topic of evolution is like going to the Nazis for information on the Jews.....

Greg November 30, 2009 at 10:50 AM  


This is my blog and I can say what I want. I support the Creation Research Society because they are scientists taht present the truth, and not the false science of evolution. I have presented many arguments the evolutionist have presented on my blog but obviously you didn't read them. Of course you are going to think I am ignorant because you blindly follow the science like it is the end all to everything. I, however, question science because it has demonstrated over and over again that many scientist don't present the truth. Let me ask you something, do you believe in aliens? The reason why I ask, because I have noticed that atheist have a hard time believing in God, but accept the idea of aliens without question. Just curious... It will take you a long time before your mind can be set free where you could understand the truth.

Greg November 30, 2009 at 5:28 PM  

And one more thing BOB, there isn't any valid science that supports the theory of evolution. It is just like global warming where Al Gore's movie was banned in Britian because of the obvious lies and deception. Evolution is full of lies and deception and it definitely isn't science. Give me one thing that is absolutely true without a shadow of a doubt concerning the theory of evolution? If there isn't any, then you should allow people to have another opinion. All the science that evolution spits out is deceptive. These fossils are just one example. A few months ago, they were making a big deal about Ida. Now that that hype is over, they start talking about Ardi which is another fraud. Give me a break BOB! You are the one that is clueless.

  © Blogger template Palm by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP