Evolutionary Fraud Part 3

>> Saturday, October 23, 2010



In my Part 2 post, one evolutionist said that Creationist are always changing their data, but that Evolutionist have never presented lies. The above article is about the Coelocanth which was theorized to be a "walking fish", and the ancestor of land vertebrates. However, it seems to be just a fish with an extra pair of fins. It is a bottom feeder like the catfish. This is just one example of the misrepresentation of the evolutionary facts.

Lets discuss other evolutionary frauds.

Nebraska Man: Developed from a single tooth.

Java Man: Only a skullcap, three teeth and a femur was found. The femur was found 50 feet away.

Orce man: One year later after it was found, officials said the skull most likely came from a 4 month old donkey.

Neanderthal: recognized to be just as human as us.

Lucy:
Lucy is a Fabrication of disarticulated & geographically separated bones of more than 30 individual skeletons, most of which may not be hominids at all.

You also might want to read about the Yale DNA Hybridization scandal.

The only thing the evolutionist in my prior post would say is how much he studied evolution, but the truth is, he was just brainwashed.

Do evolutionist even admit their fraud? Of course not! However, they keep pushing their Atheistic view point trying to deceive the masses with their false science.

This is only a small list however. The evolutionist are constantly misrepresenting the facts.

Go To Part 4

1 comments:

@bdul muHib August 13, 2009 at 9:07 AM  

So here we see again another example of how Literal Creationists change data and misrepresent. I never said that evolutionists never present lies. They are human, and there are distortions.

However, the difference is, these distortions, when they do occur (e.g. Piltdown Man, Cold Fusion) are discovered by other scientists, for science is self-correcting. In those cases where the evidence is clear and overwhelming and verified, no distortion is found, such as with Lucy and Homo neanderthalis. (Or Homo sapiens neanderthalis, as the jury is still out on if they are a separate species or the same, though evidence in the last five years has moved strongly in the former direction.)

The other thing I mentioned was different sources and lines of evidence, and when you complained I didn't mention them, I pointed out that I had, and when you complained, I pointed it out again, so I can understand how you would prefer to once again distort what I said and pretend that the only thing I did was "state how much I studied evolution".

By the way, nice false dichotomy throughout this article on evolution vs. atheism, implying the only true Christians are the Literal Creationists, and that all evolutionists are not creationists.

  © Blogger template Palm by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP