The Response about Ben Stein from Evolutionist

Ben Stein came out with a documentary called, "Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed", where he demonstrated discrimination in science against the Creationist and Intelligent Design people.

Richard Dawkins and other evolutionist are saying that they were deceived hiding the fact that the film was about "Intelligent Design". Why do they care what the movie was about when the documentary didn't make them look like idiots, but their own words did.

Of course, all of the left-wing attacks are out in full force attacking the movie. However, I think Ben Stein did a great job in interviewing both sides of the argument. When I have watched shows on the History channel about the Bible, or Noah's flood, they have always shown only one side of the issue. One geologist on this program said, "There is no evidence for a world wide flood." Are they saying that they couldn't find one geologist that believes in Noah's flood? They definitely didn't look very hard if that is the case. That is the same thing that is going on with the theory of evolution. We are presented with one side and only one side.

The fact is that there are many scientist that do not believe in the evolutionary theory and if they question it, they are reprimanded for it.

One attack on the movie is by Catsoulis where she said, "One of the sleaziest documentaries to arrive in a very long time, “Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed” is a conspiracy-theory rant masquerading as investigative inquiry."

Why does she say that? It is because the documentary is telling the truth?

The fact is that Intelligent Design is a valid scientific theory. The evolutionist are quite scared of the creationist, and that is why so few of them would be willing to debate them.

Read more...

TiVo is not just a DVR!

This is a Sponsored Post written by me on behalf of TiVo. All opinions are 100% mine.

There is one thing that I love and that is to watch my TiVo. They have this new remote with a retractable keyboard that I love as well. This remote allows to keep current on all your programs, and you can use the TiVo to see what all of your favorite actors are doing today like the Lost characters. Maybe the Lost characters are staring in other interesting shows. If you visit the TiVo Facebook Fan Page and become a follower, you will be entered in a sweepstakes where you could win one of these remotes. It is pretty easy to enter this sweepstakes so if I were you, I would Enter to Win before it is to late. If you have this remote, you will be able to keep current on all of your Fall TV programming. You can get caught up on shows like Modern Family, Glee and Modern Family. You can use the TiVo Search and the TiVo Collections to catch you up by just using a few simple clicks. So what are you waiting for? If you want a free TiVo remote and to get caught up on all of your favorite programming, you need to enter this sweepstakes by visiting their Facebook fanpage today. Don't delay because the contest will be ending shortly.

Read more...

Evolution or Creation (Young or Old Earth) Part 2

The Age of the Earth: Thousands vs. Billions of Years
Prediction: The earth will be demonstrated to be billions of years old: If the earth is less than 3 billion years old, there would not be enough time for biological evolution to occur.	Prediction: The earth will be discovered to be relatively young (e.g. more than 6,000 years, but less than 100,000,000). (Note: Intelligent Design thinking does not require a young earth, but the Young Earth/Cataclysm model, by definition, does.)
Astrophysical Dating: Light from distant objects in the universe suggests 10,000,000,000 light years as a possible age (and consequent size) for the expansion of the known universe from the Big Bang. The same light suggests that some of these distant objects contain chemical elements such as carbon, iron and uranium requiring multiple billions of years under current theory for these elements to form in second-generation stars. Thus, these second generation galaxies would require more than 16,000,000,000 years to mature and allow the light to reach the earth. By that time, the sun would have burned out and gone cold. The reality is that no one really knows how big the universe is, or from what distance light might really come, or even whether the speed of light has always been constant. Today, most science textbooks state that the solar system including the earth is 4.6 billion years old. There is no evidence for this arbitrary age. The likely reason for science to propose this age is that it allows enough time for evolution to happen. As to the universe, the age printed in textbooks has doubled every twenty years over the last 140 years. In the late 1920’s it was estimated that the universe was only 2,000,000,000 years old. While at the time of Darwin half a billion years was accepted. Now, with the observations of the Hubble telescope, some are proposing 16,000,000,000 years or more. (Therefore 2 billion, plus or minus 14 billion years, or 16 billion plus or minus 14 billion!) These disparate ages indicate a lack of precision in the measuring processes. Coupling these disparities with contradictory measurements from other dating systems caused one well known Darwinian astronomer to state: “There is no evidence based solely on solar observations that the Sun is 4.5-5.0 x 109 years old. I suspect that the sun is 4.5 billion years old. However, given some new and unexpected results to the contrary, and some time for frantic recalculation and theoretical readjustment, I suspect that we could live with Bishop Ussher’s value for the age of the earth and sun. I don’t think we have much in the way of observational evidence in astronomy to conflict with that. Solar physics now looks to paleontology for data on solar chronology.” From a speech by John Eddy at an astronomy conference Quoted by Kazmann in Geotimes 1978. The theory that the sun is fueled by fusion, burning hydrogen into helium, has some experimental support. This allows for the possibility, but does not prove that the sun is billions of years old. Predictions stated that the sun would give off neutrinos as a by-product of the fusion process. The quantities of neutrinos measured on the earth coming from the sun, however, are fewer than predicted to produce the sun’s temperature. Another theory originally proposed by Sir Isaac Newton is that the sun is heated by friction through gravitational collapse. This theory, too, has experimental support since measurements over several hundred years have indicated a slow reduction in the diameter of the sun. Sir Isaac Newton’s theory has been discarded only because it does not allow for the sun to be billions of years old, thus making evolution impossible. One explanation for the missing neutrinos is that the sun is young and that its energy is produced from a combination of both nuclear fusion and heat caused by gravitational collapse. If heat from the sun is caused by a combination of these two processes, then the sun is not billions of years old. Besides the question about how long the sun has been burning, there are a number of other astrophysical phenomena, which give maximum ages for the universe and the solar system that are much lower then the often-quoted 4.6 billion years. Some examples: *Spiral galaxy arms cannot continue to maintain form after billions of years. Spiral galaxies, therefore, appear to be too young for evolutionary timescales. *Venus, Uranus & Pluto spin backwards. Gravity would not allow this to happen for billions of years. *In the Solar System, at least 8 moons rotate backwards in a reverse spin from what would be predicted from the laws of physics. This reverse spin implies a designed, relatively young universe. There is no current naturalistic explanation for a reverse spin. *Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, & Neptune each have moons orbiting in opposite directions. Physical laws cannot explain how reverse orbits originated, nor can they explain how these orbits would be maintained for billions of years. Gravity should have caused the orbiting moons to slow each other down. Evolutionary time frames would have required that the moons crash into the mother planets a long time ago. *The moon’s interior is still hot. There seems to be no other explanation for the fact that the interior of the moon is still hot except that it appears not to have cooled off yet! It must therefore be very young! *The earth’s interior is still hot! So are a number of the other planets. These planets are thus still cooling off. There is no other hypothetical explanation for heat in the interior of the planets unless the solar system is not billions of years old! *The moon is moving away from the earth at measurable rates. Assuming a 4.6 billion year old earth, it should have escaped the earth’s orbit several billion years ago. There is no explanation as to how the Earth, or any other of the planets captured their moons into orbit. Nor is their any accepted scientific solution for the Sun to have captured the planets. *The earth’s magnetic field has decayed by 6% in the last 150 years. Some scientists have proposed a maximum age of 20,000 years using a geometric decay profile for the magnetic field.

Go To Part 3

Read more...

Watch the Movie Buried

This is a Sponsored Post written by me on behalf of goviral. All opinions are 100% mine.

If you love good movies as much as I do, you are going to want to watch the movie Buried. This is a movie about a man who was buried alive with only a lighter, a knife and a cell phone. Initially he doesn't remember how he got there, but over time it starts coming back to him. This movie is an American indie thriller directed by Rodrigo Cortes. It is staring Ryan Reynolds, Anne Lockhart and Ivano Mino. Ryan Reynolds played in movies such as National Lampoon's Van Wilder, Waiting, Just Friends, and X-Men Origins: Wolverine. Anne Lockhart play in a movie A Dog's Tale and premiered on Knight Rider and Quantum Leap. She was also Lieutenant Sheba on Battlestar Galactica. The main character is Paul Conroy who is a truck driver and somehow ends up 6 feet under. This movie premiered at the Sundance Film Festival on January 23, 2010, and its first trailer premiered with A Nightmare on Elm Street. This movie will all be presented at Deauville American Film Festival and the Toronto International Film Festival. So what are you waiting for? If you are looking for a new movie to watch, you should checkout Buried.

Read more...

Evan Thomas Calls Obama God

I am sure Obama is sitting high and mighty after hearing that Evan Thomas, a Newsweek editor, called him God. Evan Thomas said, "Obama is standing above the country. Above…above the world… "He’s sort of God." Does anybody besides me find this crazy? This is the mentality of the left. They are making Obama out to be the savior of the world. I don’t want a president that is going to be the leader of the world. I want a president that will be the leader of the United States. His primary purpose should be to the people of the United States of America, not the whole world. For a news reporter to call him God is just insane. What has this God done so far?

1)He has accumulated more debt in one hundred days than all the other Presidents combined. China is worried about the debt they are buying and are planning on huge inflation in the United States.
2)He has increased the size of government to make LBJ look like Reagan.
3)He proposed budget deficits that his own OMB Director said were "unsustainable".
4)He went on an apology tour to apologize to the world about the arrogance of the United States to promote his own popularity.
5)He has shaken the hands of dictators, and he wants to appease people who say they want to wipe Israel off the map.

Chavez and Fidel Castro said that Obama is more left-wing than they are. That is a scary thought.

So is Obama God? The answer is, "He isn’t even close". He is more like a movie star trying to be a president. That is probably why he spends most of his time giving speeches.

Limbaugh: "If Al Qaeda wants to demolish the America we know and love, they’d better hurry, because Obama's beating them to it."

Read more...

Master of Arts in Teaching degree online from USC

This is a Sponsored Post written by me on behalf of USC. All opinions are 100% mine.

This might be a good time for you to consider going back to school. When people are having tough times, going to school can help them achieve their goals. A school that was ranked #22 in the U.S and #9 among other private universities is now offering a Masters of Art degree in teaching that you can accomplish online. You can now earn your Master's degree in the comfort of your own home while you are working to raking care of your kids. This is a great opportunity for people who aren't working or are staying at home moms. You should get the program information on their website. This is your awesome opportunity to become a USC Trojan so I would definitely consider it if I were you. You can get tuition reimbursement and scholarships. You should look at their technology video that introduces their interactive program. So if you are looking for a great website to earn your Master's degree, you should checkout this website today. You will even be able to participate in the commencement ceremonies and get a free lifetime alumni association membership. This is a great opportunity that you shouldn't turn down. You should visit their website to get more information.

Read more...

The Facts about the Religion of Evolution

"I had motive for not wanting the world to have a meaning; consequently assumed that it had none, and was able without any difficulty to find satisfying reasons for this assumption. The philosopher who finds no meaning in the world is not concerned exclusively with a problem in pure metaphysics, he is also concerned to prove that there is no valid reason why he personally should not do as he wants to do, or why his friends should not seize political power and govern in the way that they find most advantageous to themselves. … For myself, the philosophy of meaninglessness was essentially an instrument of liberation, sexual and political."

Aldous Huxley, wrote Brave New World (1932)

"I know of no finding in archaeology that’s properly confirmed which is in opposition to the Scriptures. The Bible is the most accurate history textbook the world has ever seen."

Dr Clifford Wilson, formerly director of the Australian Institute of Archaeology

"‘Biologists would clearly like to know how modern apes, modern humans and the various ancestral hominids have evolved from a common ancestor. Unfortunately, the fossil record is somewhat incomplete as far as the hominids are concerned, and it is all but blank for the apes. The best we can hope for is that more fossils will be found over the next few years which will fill the present gaps in the evidence.’ The author goes on to say: ‘David Pilbeam [a well-known expert in human evolution] comments wryly, “If you brought in a smart scientist from another discipline and showed him the meagre evidence we’ve got, he'd surely say, ‘forget it: there isn’t enough to go on’.”

(Richard E. Leakey, The Making of Mankind, Michael Joseph Limited, London, 1981, p. 43)

"Humanism: An outlook that places man and his concerns at the centre of interest. Modern Humanism, which does away with traditional Christianity, is characterised by its faith in the power of human beings to create their own future, collectively and personally."
In other words, evolution = religion. That is, people (not God) set whatever rules they want. In practice, this usually becomes ‘might makes right’, including the tyranny of the majority.

Creation Ex Nihilo 22(4):23, Sepember–November 2000

‘I myself am convinced that the theory of evolution, especially the extent to which it’s been applied, will be one of the great jokes in the history books of the future. Posterity will marvel that so very flimsy and dubious an hypothesis could be accepted with the incredible credulity that it has.’

Malcolm Muggeridge, well-known British journalist and philosopher—Pascal Lectures, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada

I am just pointing out the facts. Evolution is a theory in trouble. It is dominated by atheists which validate each others claim based on their biases and not the facts. My point here is that there are many people who are experts in their fields who do not believe or have doubts about the theory of evolution. If you really look at the absurdity of evolution, you will have to come away from it troubled.

‘Evolution is promoted by its practitioners as more than mere science. Evolution is promulgated as an ideology, a secular religion—a full-fledged alternative to Christianity, with meaning and morality. I am an ardent evolutionist and an ex-Christian, but I must admit that in this one complaint—and Mr [sic] Gish is but one of many to make it—the literalists are absolutely right. Evolution is a religion. This was true of evolution in the beginning, and it is true of evolution still today.
‘… Evolution therefore came into being as a kind of secular ideology, an explicit substitute for Christianity.’

Michael Ruse was professor of philosophy and zoology at the University of Guelph, Canada (recently moved to Florida), He was the leading anti-creationist philosopher whose (flawed) arguments seemed to convince the biased judge to rule against the Arkansas ‘balanced treatment’ (of creation and evolution in schools) bill in 1981/2. At the trial, he and the other the anti-creationists loftily dismissed the claim that evolution was an anti-god religion.
‘Let me summarize my views on what modern evolutionary biology tells us loud and clear … There are no gods, no purposes, no goal-directed forces of any kind. There is no life after death. When I die, I am absolutely certain that I am going to be dead. That’s the end for me. There is no ultimate foundation for ethics, no ultimate meaning to life, and no free will for humans, either.’
Provine, W.B., Origins Research 16(1), p.9, 1994.

If you don't like what evolution teaches, you might want to consider looking at other possibilities. I realize that some of you think I am crazy for not believing in evolution. You might think that I don't know what I am talking about. That is why I am creating this post so you are aware that I am not the only one that doesn't believe in this theory. Like I said before, creationist are religious, and so are the people who believe in evolution. I am not saying that science is religion. There is some serious valid sciences that isn't religious. However, the so called science concerning origin of life or the universe is a religious concept if it involves God or no God. It takes a lot of faith to believe in the Big Bang and that makes you just as religious as a Creationist. So don't fool yourself if you are an atheist thinking that your scientific views should dominate over the theory of Creationism. Creationism can develop theories just like evolutionist. Our theories involve a Creator because we know that complexity requires intelligence.

Read more...